What Is Parental Alienation?

Parental alienation is invoked in courtrooms across New Jersey and the country. It may be part of a child custody case where it’s used as a false accusation, a tactical weapon to discredit the other parent. Depending on who you ask, parental alienation is a well-documented form of emotional child abuse or a foundation-free theory that shouldn’t influence custody decisions. The truth, like the average child custody case, is not black or white.

Parental alienation, according to its supporters, is a situation where one parent systematically undermines a child’s relationship with the other parent through words, conduct, or manipulation. It was first labeled in the 1980s.

Stereotypically, the alienating parent:

• Makes negative statements about the other parent in the child’s presence
• Coaches the child to falsely report false abuse or neglect
• Restricts the other parent’s access to the child without legitimate justification
• Threatens to withhold love and attention unless the child chooses them over the other parent
• Enlists extended family members to reinforce a damaging narrative

The child caught up in this drama may:

• Repeat the alienating parent’s hostility
• Refuse to visit, talk to, or comply with the other parent’s directions or requests
• Accuse the targeted parent of behavior that never occurred or of repeating words that were never spoken
• Reject an otherwise healthy relationship without a rational explanation

The judge in a child custody case must make a decision based on the child’s best interests. They need to determine whether this situation is due to a parent’s manipulation or a response to abuse the child actually experienced.

How Would a Claim of Parental Alienation Impact a New Jersey Child Custody/Parenting Time Dispute?

A judge in this situation would be wise to appoint a guardian ad litem for the child. This is an independent advocate for the child who would investigate the accusations and determine, as best they can, whether a child’s alienation from a parent is the product of manipulation or genuine abuse. The judge may also have an independent psychological evaluation of the child and appoint an attorney to represent the child.

In New Jersey, the governing standard in custody matters is the best interests of the child. A judge should, if not prevent, at least limit the custody of a parent abusing their child in some way. Courts may modify custody arrangements, reduce parenting time, impose supervised visitation, or, in extreme cases, transfer primary residential custody to the other parent.

Emotional abuse of a child can be the kind that would make them want to stay away from a parent. It’s also emotionally manipulating a child to turn them against the other parent by making false allegations. Both can have long-term negative impacts on the child.

Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, courts must consider relevant factors when making custody determinations (the statute lists 16 factors and leaves it to the judge to consider others). Two important ones that touch on parental alienation claims are the following:

• The ability of each parent to communicate and cooperate in matters relating to the child
• The willingness of each parent to facilitate a relationship between the child and the other parent

Brand New Public Policy for New Jersey in Child Custody/Parenting Time Cases

Importantly, a recent change in the law of New Jersey mandates a strong presumption of judicial interviews of minor children. If you are navigating a divorce or a custody dispute in New Jersey, the ground beneath your feet just shifted in a significant way. On January 20, 2026, Governor Murphy signed Senate Bill S4510 into law. This is a fundamental transformation of how our courts view the “best interests of the child.”

For decades, the legal system operated under certain assumptions about parental contact. While the goal was always to keep both parents involved, the execution sometimes overlooked the specific nuances of safety and a child’s individual experience. The new law changes that. It demands that judges look at every family through a clear lens, without relying on old templates or generic presumptions. It moves us toward a system where the safety of the child is the starting point of every conversation, not an afterthought.

Balancing Child Safety Against Parental Alienation

A parent falsely accusing the other of abusing their child to alienate them from the other parent would flunk both these factors. A court could order reunification therapy, appoint a parenting coordinator, or hold an alienating parent in contempt for interfering with court-ordered parenting time.

The New Jersey Appellate Division’s 2024 decision in A.U.B. v. E.L. is a case in which a trial judge found the child’s mother actively tried to alienate her son against his father and awarded the father sole custody. The decision was upheld on appeal.

The trial judge found both parents were dysfunctional and “minimally fit” but ruled it was in the child’s best interests for the father to have sole custody and the mother to have limited parenting time. The Appellate Division stated in part:

The [trial] judge highlighted that plaintiff was the parent better able to communicate, cooperate, and facilitate parenting time in considering factors one and two. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). In contrast, the judge found that defendant’s alienating behaviors undermined her ability to foster a relationship between plaintiff and the child. A parent’s repeated inability to co-parent and interfere with the other parent can support an award of sole legal custody to the other parent. Nufrio, 241 N.J. Super. at 555. See also Beck, 86 N.J. at 499 (“[W]hen the actions of [an uncooperative] parent deprive the child of the kind of relationship with the other parent that is deemed to be in the child’s best interests, removing the child from the custody of the uncooperative parent may well be appropriate as a remedy of last resort.”). As [the independent psychologist working on the case] explained, defendant was incapable of finding any positive element in plaintiff’s relationship with the child, and her inability resulted in her alienating behavior and interference with parenting time. And, defendant did very little to promote plaintiff’s relationship with the child. According to [the psychologist], while the child’s young age allowed him to separate his positive experiences from defendant’s negative descriptions of plaintiff, there was a genuine threat that the child eventually would reject plaintiff if defendant’s behavior persisted. The record supports this determination.

If there’s enough evidence to support a parental alienation claim, there is legal precedent that the target of these actions should get preferential treatment in a custody matter.

Does Parental Alienation Actually Happen?

Children may be influenced by a parent’s narrative about the other parent, and sustained exposure to denigrating messages can reshape a child’s feelings and memories. Adult survivors of these cult-like situations have reported lasting damage to their ability to form relationships and a deep sense of having been used as instruments in their parents’ conflict.

History is filled with examples of people manipulated by political and religious leaders. Advertisers and marketers attempt to manipulate potential buyers of goods and services because, many times, those efforts work. It’s difficult to argue that no parent can manipulate any child into fearing or hating the other parent. The issue should be whether it actually happened, or was at least attempted, in a particular case.

What’s the Evidence That Parental Alienation Is a Groundless Way to Attack the Other Parent?

The American Psychological Association Dictionary of Psychology has this to say about parental alienation:

Although some accept Parental Alienation Syndrome as admissible evidence in child custody disputes, there have been no well-controlled empirical studies that confirm the phenomenon, nor have a standardized assessment process and specific diagnostic criteria been established for it. Consequently, many critics express concerns about its continued influence on legal proceedings. The syndrome has been dismissed by the American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, and American Medical Association as lacking supporting empirical or clinical evidence and it is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.

However, the description goes on to state:

Despite the significant controversy surrounding this syndrome, the more generalized concept of parental alienation often is viewed as a legitimate dynamic in many family situations, describing the harm done to a child’s security with one caregiver as a result of exposure to another caregiver’s unfavorable actions toward or criticism of that person.

A primary concern among critics of identifying parental alienation is that it misinterprets evidence that would otherwise indicate actual child abuse, reports ProPublica. It can be used as a shield by a parent who abuses their child to escape accountability in a child custody matter by recasting evidence of abuse (a child’s fear of a parent) as evidence of parental alienation.

These situations require deep study and review by forensic experts on a case-by-case basis and careful handling by Family Court Judges.

Contact Kingston Law Group for Help with Child Custody and Parenting Time Disputes

We represent parents on both sides of this issue. We thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and parental alienation. Based on what we find, we provide our clients with the best options to achieve their goals.  You are over 18 and competent, and therefore it is entirely up to you to decide how you want your matter to be handled.

For help with child custody and parenting time disputes, call us at 609-683-7400 to arrange a near-term, reduced-fee initial consultation. We will listen to your facts, discuss the law, and advise you of your options. We accept credit cards and offer appointments from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. We also have pre-arranged evening appointments. Contact us today.  You’ll be glad you did!!

The post Is Parental Alienation Real or is it Junk Science? first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

What Does It Mean to Be Poached?

When a company wants to hire someone who is employed, it, or a recruiter, may contact that person directly. The company reaches out to you, even though you were not looking for a new job. They talk to you about leaving your current employer and taking a new job with them. If you’re interested enough, you may take them up on their offer.

Poaching is very common in fields like technology, finance, health care, and law. Companies do it because they want skilled and experienced workers, and they’re having difficulty filling these openings. It is legal in most cases.

Taking this job may or may not be legal if you’ve signed a non-compete agreement and your potential employer is covered by it. The devil is in the details of the agreement. If this is your situation, contact us so we can discuss the matter, and you can see where you stand.

What Are the Pros and Cons of Being Poached?

Being recruited by another company can bring real benefits, including the following:

• A higher salary and better benefits
• A chance to grow in your career
• The ability to do something new
• Leaving an organization or management that you feel isn’t right for you or is headed in the wrong direction
• It can feel good to know another company values your experience and skills

But changing jobs also comes with risks:

• You lose the seniority and trust you built at your old job
• You may lose retirement savings or stock options that had not vested
• Benefits like health insurance may not start right away or may not be offered at all
• The new job may not turn out to be what was promised, or you were so desperate to leave the old job that you ignored warning signs of trouble ahead

Taking a new job is a gamble. How big a gamble depends on your current work and compensation, along with the potential upsides and downsides of the new position and employer.

What Is Overtime Pay?

Overtime pay is money you earn when you work more than 40 hours in one week. You may be entitled to one and a half times your normal pay rate for those extra hours, depending on your status, applicable law, and union contract, if there is one. For example, if you earn $20 an hour, overtime pay should be $30 an hour.

This rule comes from the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, also known as the FLSA. New Jersey law also follows this formula.

Who Gets Overtime Pay?

Not everyone qualifies. Workers are generally split into two groups under the law, which are the following:

• “Nonexempt” or hourly workers must be paid overtime when they work more than 40 hours a week
• “Exempt” or salaried workers do not get overtime pay, no matter how many hours they work, if their status meets all the legal requirements

Simply having the “exempt” label, a certain job title, or being paid a salary isn’t enough to disqualify you for overtime pay. There are pay requirements. You must be paid a set salary, not an hourly wage, and earn at least $684 per week, or $35,568 annually.

There are also duties tests, including the following:

• Executive: Managers who direct the business (or a department) as their primary duty, and are responsible for at least two other employees with hiring/firing authority
• Administrative: Office or non-manual workers whose primary duties include independent judgment on significant business matters
• Professional: These jobs require advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning (usually requiring a specialized degree), or they’re creative professionals
• Other categories: Certain outside salespeople, computer-related employees, and highly compensated employees

All of the qualifications must be met to deny a salaried person overtime pay. For example, in an administrative role, if the job doesn’t allow for truly independent judgment and/or the matters being worked on are insignificant, even if the person is paid a salary, they should be paid overtime.

What Are My Legal Options If I Am Denied Overtime?

If you believe your employer is illegally denying you overtime pay, call our office because you have legal rights and options for proceeding.

You may also report your employer to the US Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, which enforces the FLSA, and they can investigate your employer. You may also file a complaint with the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development. They enforce applicable state law.

Filing a legal action in state or federal court against your employer (or former employer if you left) may be an option. Under the FLSA, a successful case may result in an award of the following:

• The unpaid overtime wages you are owed
• An equal amount in extra damages, called liquidated damages, doubling your recovery
• Your attorneys’ fees and court costs

A successful New Jersey Wage Payment Law and Wage and Hour Law case may also result in an award of attorneys’ fees and costs, but three times the pay you were denied.

Can My Employer Take Actions Against Me If I Object to Being Denied Overtime Pay?

Your employer cannot legally fire or punish you for objecting about denied overtime pay, for filing a complaint with a government agency, or for filing a related lawsuit. This would be considered retaliation, which is against federal and state laws, and gives rise to significant sanctions against the employer.

If your employer retaliates against you, that creates a separate legal claim. Depending on the facts, your overtime pay claim may be unsuccessful, but if there’s enough evidence of retaliation, you may obtain compensation for that.

Has Your Employer Treated You Illegally in Some Way?

If you believe your employer violated your rights because it didn’t pay you overtime wages, or retaliated against you because you brought it up, we will listen to your facts, explain the law, and suggest right and reasonable approaches for relief.

Kingston Law Group provides compassionate counsel and tough advocacy. We are ready to help you, your loved ones, and your friends. Call us at +1-609-683-7400 or contact us online to schedule a near-term initial consultation at a reduced hourly rate. Call or write us today. You’ll be glad you did.

The post Recruited Away and Then Not Paid Your Overtime? Here Are Your Legal Options! first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

If you don’t have one, you may have come across online viral discussions about the “Gen Z stare.” It’s a neutral, expressionless look that younger workers may give in response to a question or comment that, in other people from a different time, may prompt a warm smile and small talk. Every generation contributes to workplace culture change, and this one reflects Gen Z.

Kingston Law Group helps employees protect and enforce their rights under state and federal laws. If you have any questions or concerns about an issue with your employer, call us at 609-683-7400 so we can discuss the situation and how we may be of help.

Who is Gen Z?

“Gen Z” is the term applied to those born after 1996, according to the Annie E. Casie Foundation. Older members are in their 20s, have become more politically engaged, and are an increasingly important part of the workforce.

While they share many characteristics with millennials (born between 1981 and 1996), they have been shaped by a very different world, which impacts their attitudes, tendencies, and outlook.

Gen Z, compared to earlier generations, is more racially and ethnically diverse and more likely to be the children of immigrants. They’re also more likely to live in single-parent households, including where traditional gender roles aren’t in place.

They’re generally highly educated, have an increased interest in working in trades, value improving their experience and skills more than climbing corporate ladders, and value a healthy work-life balance.

What Is the “Gen Z Stare”?

The “Gen Z stare” refers to a neutral or expressionless response when older generations would normally expect a verbal or emotional reply. This may reflect many things, including being more comfortable with digital than in-person interaction, incomplete social development, a form of active listening, or being uncomfortable or ignorant of the topic being discussed. It could also indicate being stressed about a situation, possibly due to a disability.

Why Would a Stare Get an Employee in Trouble?

Older management may interpret it as disengagement, disrespect, or poor performance. Depending on the person, it may just be a different communication style.

If management would rather punish you than communicate and work with you, that’s their choice to make, as long as they’re not singling you out for negative treatment due to a legally protected status. This would be your age, race, color, sexual orientation, disability, gender, marital status, religion, or lack thereof.

Could Management Be Illegally Biased Against Gen Z Because of Their Age?

Gen Z is in their 20s and early 30s. The federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects workers 40 and older. The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) begins protecting employees at age 18. Each discrimination case is based on evidence. The stronger the evidence, the better the case.

There could be many issues with a supervisor that cut either way:

• The supervisor actively hires and promotes younger people, but, rightly or wrongly, doesn’t accept your communication style, and you suffer as a result
• Your supervisor may have had nothing to do with your hiring. They are biased against those your age because of your many perceived shortcomings. The stare might be the beginning. This person may see those your age as lazy, uninterested in anything beyond “punching the clock”, lacking loyalty to the company, and someone who’ll never get ahead in the organization. The latest trends may feed their bias.

If you have questions about situations like these, you should call our office so we can discuss what’s going on and how to protect your legal rights.

Could Management Be Illegally Biased Against a Member of Gen Z Because of a Disability?

The federal Americans with Disabilities Act and the state NJLAD prohibit disability-based employment practices. The ADA covers government employers and private ones with 15 or more employees. The NJLAD covers non-federal employers of all sizes.

Disability law covers employees who are disabled (a major life activity is substantially limited), have a record of a disability, are perceived as disabled, or are associated with someone with a disability (such as a spouse or family member). Those who qualify generally must be afforded a necessary, reasonable accommodation to perform the essential functions of a position.

That need not be granted if the accommodation would cause an undue burden on the employer. Both parties should be flexible and open to discussion on how to meet each other’s needs.

The “Gen Z stare” could be more than an acceptable practice among people of a similar age. It may be due to a desire to minimize parts of themselves they fear aren’t universally accepted, like their race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, disability, or some other characteristic. If the workplace is racially biased, a non-White employee will probably be less likely to show enthusiasm.

The person may be dealing with anxiety, neurodivergent traits, a learning disability, depression, or other conditions that the person feels they should hide to survive in a workplace that rewards being extroverted.

If this becomes an issue for an employee, they should:

• Explain the situation in confidential communications with their supervisor so the employer is aware that there’s a psychological, emotional, or physical disability that explains how an employee communicates or interacts with others
• Request that they be reasonably accommodated by being fairly judged on how they perform their work, not on their outward enthusiasm

If an employer disciplines you for not smiling on cue or exhibiting enthusiastic body language, could they be penalizing you for conditions that qualify for protection under the ADA or NJLAD?

Depending on the position, an employer may feel that a solid connection to someone you’re communicating with is an essential function of the job (sales, for instance), and allowing someone detached and withdrawn to hold that position may cause an undue hardship (reduced sales), so a reasonable accommodation shouldn’t be provided.

Do You Feel Discriminated Against By Your Employer?

Kingston Law Group provides compassionate counsel and tough advocacy for employees. We are ready to help you, your loved ones, and your friends. Call us at +1-609-683-7400 or contact us online to schedule a near-term initial consultation at a reduced hourly rate. Call or write us today. You’ll be glad you did.

The post “Culture Fit” and Discrimination: The Gen Z Stare and Workplace Bias first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

Kingston Law Group’s child custody practice has helped hundreds of parents and children over the years. These cases can be highly emotional and stressful, but they need not be. No matter which side of the issue you’re on, we can help. Call us at 609-683-7400 or contact us online to learn more.

What are a Child’s Best Interests?

The primary goal of a custody decision is to further a child’s best interests. Issues a court should consider in deciding who gets what type of custody rights include the following:

• The parents’ ability to agree, communicate, and cooperate in matters concerning the child
• A parent’s willingness to accept custody
• Any history of unwillingness to allow parenting time with the other parent that’s not based on substantiated evidence of abuse
• Interactions with and the relationships of the child with their parents and siblings
• A history of domestic violence, if any
• The child’s safety and that of a parent from physical abuse by the other parent
• The preference of the child who is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent opinion
• The child’s needs
• The home environment’s stability
• The quality and continuity of the child’s education
• The parents’ fitness
• The geographical proximity of the parents’ homes
• The quantity and quality of the time a parent spent with the child before or after a separation
• The parents’ job responsibilities
• The number and age of children

This checklist is how the NJ Legislature spelled out how a judge should consider a child’s best interests.

What is a Guardian Ad Litem?

Under Rule 5:8B of the state’s court system:

• In cases where custody or parenting time/visitation is at issue, a guardian ad litem may be appointed by a court order to represent the best interests of the child or children if the judge feels the circumstances warrant the appointment
• The guardian ad litem’s services shall be for the court and on the child’s behalf
• A judge may appoint a GAL on their own or at the request of either or both parents
• The GAL files a written report with the court containing factual findings, custody recommendations, and their reasons
• A GAL is available to testify and could be subject to cross-examination

A GAL’s duties can include, but aren’t limited to, the following:

• Interviewing the parents and children
• Interviewing others with relevant information
• Obtaining relevant documentary evidence
• Conferring with the parties’ attorneys
• Conferring with the court, after giving notice to the parties’ attorneys
• Obtaining help from independent experts, with court approval
• Getting help from a lawyer for the child, with court approval
• Other matters, as the GAL may request, with court approval

The notes from this Rule state:

• The GAL is an independent fact finder, investigator, and evaluator on what will advance the child’s best interests
• A guardian ad litem may be an attorney, a social worker, a mental health professional, or another appropriate person
• A GAL would be appointed if their purpose is to perform an independent investigation and fact-finding
• If the GAL’s primary function is to act as an expert, the court should appoint a GAL who has the appropriate expertise

The GAL keeps the court and the parties updated on their progress. The final report will be the subject of a court hearing. Judges usually give a lot of weight to the GAL’s findings and recommendations when rendering a custody decision.

The parents normally pay the cost of the GAL’s services. Payment may be evenly split or based on the parents’ ability to pay.

Can a Parent Object to a GAL’s Appointment?

A parent could claim:

• There’s no need to appoint a Guardian Ad Litem
• The person nominated isn’t qualified
• The nominee is biased for or against a parent
• There’s a conflict of interest between the nominee and one or both of the parties

The chances of a successful challenge would depend on the evidence and the parent’s reasoning.

Can a Judge Appoint Others in a Custody Case?

Court rules also allow for a judge to appoint an attorney to represent the child’s interests (Rule 5:8A) and a special advocate for a child (Rule 5:8C). These roles are not the same as a GAL.

• The court-appointed lawyer represents the child. The appointment should be made if the judge decides that the parties’ attorneys don’t sufficiently protect the child’s best interests
• A volunteer Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) would act for the court to undertake certain activities to further the child’s interests. They’re not to replace or interfere with a GAL or a court-appointed lawyer for the child

A judge can also appoint a child psychologist to determine the child’s best interests. Given the importance of recognizing those interests, the child’s legal rights, and a judge’s desire to avoid an appeal of a decision because they hadn’t taken enough effort to protect those rights and interests, these appointments are not unusual.

How Should a Parent Approach a GAL and Their Work?

A GAL is neither a friend you can count on nor an enemy to fight. Their job is to be independent and focus on your child’s best interests. They’re not interested in your life story, nor do they want to hear your critiques of the other parent. Work with your attorney on communicating with the GAL and provide them with a time to see you and your home.

Things to consider include the following:

• Return calls and emails promptly, provide requested documents, and make yourself available for interviews. Obstruction or delay reflects poorly on you.
• Your credibility matters. GALs are experienced at detecting inconsistencies
• Exaggerating concerns or downplaying your own shortcomings can backfire
• What you say should be framed around your child’s well-being, not the other parent’s deficiencies. Excessive negativity about the other parent shows poor co-parenting ability
• Think through what you want the guardian ad litem to understand about your relationship with your child and your home environment. Before meeting, you may want to outline important issues to bring up, but don’t write yourself a script or rehearse answers
• Before a home visit, ensure your home is safe, organized, and child-appropriate
• Have relevant documentation ready (school records, medical records, communication logs) while not overwhelming the GAL with unsolicited material.
• If you have serious, legitimate concerns about the other parent, raise them calmly and with specific, factual examples, not emotional accusations
• Let the GAL interview your child without coaching them. You need to explain what’s going on, but don’t rehearse responses

Put yourself in the GAL’s shoes. To do your job, what would you ask? What would you want to see? A guardian ad litem understands the importance of this meeting and your conversation, as well as the stress you’re under. If a home visit isn’t picture perfect or what you said wasn’t a textbook response, don’t beat yourself up over it.

Contact Kingston Law Group for Help with Child Custody Matters

For help with child custody disputes, call us at 609-683-7400 to arrange a near-term, reduced-fee initial consultation. We will listen to your facts, discuss the law, and advise you of your options. We accept credit cards and offer appointments from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. We also have pre-arranged evening appointments. Contact us today.  You will be glad you did!!

The post A Guardian Ad Litem Helps Determine a Child’s Best Interests first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

The Kingston Law Group helps employees protect and enforce their rights under state and federal laws. If you have any questions or concerns about an issue with your employer, call us at 609-683-7400 so we can discuss the situation and how we may be able to help.

What is the FLSA?

The FLSA is a federal law that establishes a national minimum wage, recordkeeping, overtime pay, and youth employment standards for private employees and those in federal, state, and local governments. For these standards to apply, the person in question must be an employee under the statute.

Someone enforcing the FLSA must consider the facts of each situation. As interpreted by federal courts, the way to determine if one is an employee covered by the FLSA or an independent contractor who is not is to evaluate the following factors:

• How much the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business
• How permanent is the relationship between the parties
• How much the alleged contractor invested in facilities and equipment
• The nature and degree of the principal’s control
• The alleged contractor’s exposure to profit and loss
• How much initiative, judgment, or foresight in competition with others is required for the claimed independent contractor’s success
• The degree of independent business operation and organization

What’s irrelevant to deciding whether the person’s an employee includes the following:

• Where the work is performed
• Whether or not there’s a formal employment contract
• Whether a state or local government licenses the worker

Some things that affect a worker’s status include the following:

• Employee: Control over the worker to the point they can’t work for another business, informally or through an explicit agreement
• Employee: A company requires a worker to agree to a fixed term of work, not work for a competitor after that time ends, or face restrictions or sanctions for leaving a job to seek other opportunities
• Employee: If a business makes investments into equipment and tools and provides them to a worker, they may rely on the business to supply them to perform their services, making it harder for them to seek other opportunities, and they will be more dependent on the business for an income
• Either: Whether the worker has the skills needed to find and manage different work projects that independent contractors typically handle, or task-specific, specialized skills that would normally be part of the employer’s operations. The person is more likely to be an employee if they rely on the employer to give them the necessary skills to perform a job
• Independent contractor: The opportunities for profit or loss typically arise when the worker receives additional compensation for using initiative, judgment, or foresight, not just greater efficiency. They can renegotiate compensation during the working relationship, or risk money invested in the job or its outcome
• Employee: The person’s services are integrated into a business and part of its primary purpose

There’s no “hard and fast” rule that may definitively decide you’re legally an employee misclassified as an independent contractor and being denied wages and benefits that you’re owed. It’s more of a checklist that may cut either way, depending on the facts.

What was the Biden Administration’s Position on Defining an Employee?

A Biden-era rule covering how a person would be determined as an employee, as opposed to being misclassified as an independent contractor under the FLSA, included a focus on whether, as an “economic reality,” a worker is dependent on a possible employer for work, not income (which would make them an employee), or is self-employed and in business for themself (making them an independent contractor).

The 2024 rule imposed what some interpreted as a more worker-friendly standard for independent contractor classification than the guidance created by the first Trump administration. The rule faced legal challenges from business groups. They claimed the rule needlessly increased costs, reduced employer flexibility, and created legal uncertainty. Though these plaintiffs tried, no court issued an order blocking this rule.

What Did the Trump Administration Do About the Rule?

The federal Department of Labor (which enforces the FLSA) issued Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-1 last year. It instructed its staff to stop applying the 2024 rule’s analysis when deciding whether someone is an independent contractor or employee under the FLSA. Instead, if an employer had not paid back wages or civil money penalties as of May 1, 2025, staff were told to analyze the person’s employment status under the framework listed in the DOL’s Fact Sheet #13, published in 2008, as interpreted by the agency’s Opinion Letter FLSA 2019-6.

The standard, as stated in Fact Sheet #13, is more employer-friendly than the Biden administration’s 2024 rule, and there’s no substantial change for workers and employers for several reasons, including the following:

• Many states’ wage and hour laws’ employment tests differ from federal law, including New Jersey’s (which is more worker-friendly).
• The DOL’s guidance was described as a temporary measure, but months have passed, and they haven’t offered anything new.
• The DOL under President Trump’s first administration created its own rule on this issue, but his second administration isn’t going back to that guidance. It’s reaching back to one created when Barack Obama was President

At the federal level, given the Trump administration’s actions, this area of law is in flux. Though there are some general rules of thumb, this is a very fact-specific legal topic, so it’s difficult to give you valid advice without a thorough conversation. If you have questions or concerns about being paid and how much, schedule a consultation with us.

Has Your Employer Treated You Illegally in Some Way?

If you believe your employer is violating your rights because it’s not treating and paying you like an employee? If so, we will listen to your facts, explain the law, and suggest right and reasonable approaches for relief.

Kingston Law Group provides workers with compassionate counsel and tough advocacy. We are ready to help you, your loved ones, and your friends. Call us at +1-609-683-7400 or contact us online to schedule a near-term initial consultation at a reduced hourly rate. Call or write us today. You’ll be glad you did.

The post Federal Law Definition of Employee Takes a Couple of Steps Backward first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

Kingston Law Group’s domestic abuse practice has helped hundreds of people over the years. These are highly stressful and possibly violent situations that must be taken seriously. No matter which side of the issue you’re on, we can help. Call us at 609-683-7400 or contact us online to learn more.

What is New Jersey’s Victims’ Assistance and Survivor Protection Act (VASPA)?

VASPA provides civil restraining orders for victims and survivors of sexual violence, stalking, and cyber harassment – in cases where entry of a Domestic Violence Restraining Order may be unavailable for legal/jurisdictional reasons.  In addition to possible criminal law charges and protections, a VASPA protective order may provide civil mitigation of the following acts:

• Nonconsensual sexual contact or sexual penetration
• Lewdness
• Stalking
• Cyber harassment

A VASPA order prohibits a defendant from further committing these acts and:

• Contacting the victim directly or through a third party
• Going to the victim’s residence, school, or workplace
• Other relief a court deems appropriate

If a VASPA order is violated, there are civil and criminal penalties, which may include the following:

• Arrest
• Fines
• Probation
• Jail time

A judge may also impose other relief that’s deemed appropriate. Those who may apply for a VASPA order include the following:

• Victims and survivors who are 18 years old or older
• A parent or guardian on behalf of someone younger than 18 years old who has a mental disorder or defect, or developmental disability

These orders are different from domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs). VASPA orders may or may not apply to individuals with romantic, marital, family, or parenting relationships, while DVROs do. A VASPA order could be granted to someone who may not qualify for a DVRO.

Angry Spouse Bangs on Door Early in the Morning, Sends Texts People Wouldn’t Normally Receive

The Appellate Division recently ruled in a case involving a wife (R.S. in the decision), her husband, and a woman (A.C.) in a romantic relationship with the husband when the parties were divorcing. On an early November 2024 morning, R.S. went to A.C.’s house while the husband was present. She banged on a door and window, yelling at A.C. to meet her outside. The husband left the house, tried to talk her into leaving, but she stayed, and he left. A.C. ignored R.S.’s words and actions.

The two had never met, but while “making a scene” outside the house, R.S. made personal statements about A.C., who called the police. When the police arrived, they spoke to R.S., who left. A.C. asked them for a domestic violence restraining order, but was told she didn’t qualify.

At about 2:00 A.M., R.S. started texting her husband and A.C. Her texts included claims that there was no need to call the police and allegations that:

• Her husband and A.C. maintain fake public personas
• Their relationship started before the divorce
• She was going to contact A.C.’s employer and tell them about the relationship

R.S. then forwarded a phone message A.C. left for the husband.  R.S.’s texts included graphic descriptions of the sex she could have with her husband and the statement “ITS ON!”, which A.C. interpreted as a threat. R.S. mentioned A.C.’s husband and children and she went to see them in person.

At a hearing where A.C. sought a final protective order (FPO), she testified, “This is very concerning. I do not want this type of erratic behavior and safety risk around my children…It’s troubling. It’s dangerous.”

R.S. admitted she learned of her addresses through online research, and visited those addresses. She stated that she learned of A.C.’s address online and about A.C. after speaking with her husband. R.S. stated she didn’t plan on physically going to A.C.’s workplace, but was planning to inform A.C.’s work of the affair.

The trial judge decided that R.S. had not stalked A.C. and ruled in R.S.’s favor on the following issues:

• The text communications threatening to contact the employer were cyber-harassment under New Jersey law
• There was a threat to A.C.’s property interests
• The sexual description by R.S., the time of the 2:00 am texts, and R.S.’s visits to A.C.’s husband and children were meant to harass A.C.

R.S. appealed the decision.

Appeals Court Rules R.S. Didn’t Cross Legal Lines and Dismissed FPO

The Appellate Court ruled that the alleged language and behavior weren’t covered by VASPA and dismissed the trial court’s Order. R.S. claimed text messages aren’t cyberstalking under the law, because they were based on the telephone system, not the internet. The court disagreed, stating that such messages could be communicated over the internet and that such a finding was consistent with the law’s broad purpose of protecting victims. The court also stated that R.S. by implicating A.C.’s job potentially infringed on her property rights.

However, those two plaintiff high points were drowned out by the rest of the higher court’s decisions:

• S.’s statement about possible sex acts with her husband wasn’t lewd under the statute because they didn’t include images of genitalia to arouse or gratify someone
• The threat to contact A.C.’s employer doesn’t constitute cyber-stalking because she didn’t threaten to cause injury or harm, make false statements, or commit a crime, which could affect the plaintiff’s job if done

As repulsive and angry as R.S.’ words and actions may have been, they didn’t cross the line into what would trigger VASPA action. But maintaining control should always be your goal, even in the most heated domestic situations.

If you’re involved in a domestic dispute, and what you say or do is reprehensible but not so bad that one order or another will be issued against you, those words might still come back to haunt you. They may be used as evidence of your inability to control yourself and how over-emotional you can become in a way that could hurt your interests, including child custody and parenting time.

Contact Kingston Law Group for Help with Restraining Orders

Please contact us at 609-683-7400 toll-free to arrange a consultation. We accept credit cards and offer general appointments from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, or pre-arranged evening appointment times.

The post New Jersey Appellate Division: People Say Nasty Things to or About You, but You Still May Not Get a Protective Order first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

New Jersey’s child custody laws are parent-neutral. An individual judge may feel mothers are better parents, but we don’t see improper bias by judges assigned to our cases overpowering the evidence. Though judges have a lot of discretion in deciding custody cases, their decisions must be grounded in facts that show their ruling is in a child’s best interests.

Kingston Law Group’s child custody practice has helped thousands of parents and children over 4 and a half decades. Child custody disputes can be highly stressful and emotional, but they don’t have to be that way.  Call us at 609-683-7400 or contact us online to learn more.

What is Child Custody?

Child custody under New Jersey law refers to a parent’s rights and responsibilities regarding their child’s care, decision-making, and physical time together. There are two types of custody arrangements, including:

• Legal Custody: The ability to decide critical matters impacting your child’s welfare, education, healthcare, and religion
• Physical Custody: Deciding where your child lives on a daily basis and which parent provides primary care

Custody may be joint (shared by both parents) or sole (one parent makes these decisions), and different combinations are possible. Parents usually share legal custody. Physical custody may also be shared, or one may have primary physical custody. Generally, judges favor custody arrangements where both parents remain actively involved in the child’s life.

How is Child Custody Decided in New Jersey?

The most crucial issue is what’s in the child’s best interests. Parents may disagree on what’s required to ensure those interests. They can work out their disagreements and create a written agreement. If so, a judge reviews and usually approves it.

They could reject it if the judge feels the child’s best interests aren’t being served. The parents could alter the agreement or litigate the issue. The parents would also need to go to trial if they can’t reach an agreement. If the parties can’t negotiate a resolution, mediation may help them end the conflict.

State law provides a list of issues for judges to consider when determining what would be in the child’s best interests. They include the following:

• The parents’ ability to communicate, agree, and cooperate in parenting matters
• The parents’ willingness to accept custody and their history of reluctance or refusal to allow the other parent to have time with the child that’s not based on substantiated abuse claims
• The interactions and relationships of the child with their parents and siblings
• Any history of domestic violence
• The safety of either parent and the child from physical abuse by the other parent
• The child’s preference, if they’re old and mature enough and have the mental capacity to reason and form an intelligent decision
• The child’s needs
• The offered home environment’s stability
• The quality and continuity of the child’s education
• The parents’ fitness to have custody rights
• The physical proximity of the parents’ homes
• The quantity and quality of the time the parent spent with the child before or after the parents’ separation
• The parents’ employment responsibilities
• The age and number of children

A judge is free to ignore factors that aren’t an issue in a case and bring up factors not included in state law if the judge feels they’re relevant.

Does New Jersey Law Favor Mothers in Custody Disputes?

There’s no explicit language in state law favoring or discouraging a custody rights award to a man or woman. State law includes the following language:

The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public policy of this State to assure minor children of frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage and that it is in the public interest to encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this policy…In any proceeding involving the custody of a minor child, the rights of both parents shall be equal…

If one parent gets the custody rights they seek, and the other does not, it should be the result of well-reasoned judgment on how a child’s needs can be best met based on the case’s evidence. A court ruling based on a parent’s sex, not on the child’s best interests, could be appealed and overturned.

Should New Jersey Law State That Equally Shared Child Custody is the Favored Approach?

Some fathers who didn’t get the custody rights they sought feel the legal system discriminates against them because of their sex. Traditionally and stereotypically, women are seen as caregivers and nurturers, while fathers are more distant, less connected to their kids, and spend most of their time and energy working and providing the family with income. That may be the case with some families, but no one, especially a judge, should assume that’s the case in a particular matter.

A recent Wall Street Journal article looked at Kentucky and other states that changed their laws to state that equally shared child custody was the preferred situation, but that outcome could change if a parent could show by a preponderance of evidence (it’s more likely than not) that it wouldn’t be in the child’s best interests.

The National Parents Organization (NPO), an advocacy group formerly known as Fathers and Families, lobbies for this change, arguing that it would help ensure fathers get equal time with their kids.  The NPO rates states based on how it believes their laws explicitly equalize parents’ ability to obtain custody rights. Five states got A’s. New Jersey and 14 others got D’s.

Eight years ago, Kentucky was the first state to pass a law making equally shared custody the default arrangement in divorces and separations. Four other states (Arkansas, West Virginia, Florida, and Missouri) have passed similar legislation. The NPO claims that about 20 other state legislatures are considering or close to passing similar laws.

After the law changed in Kentucky, the state’s divorce rate decreased by 25% (it went down 18% nationwide). Some claim that because of the law, more parents with marital problems are deciding not to divorce, since they’ll probably both care for their kids if they do, so they work to improve their relationship. That would be a positive, but staying together is a negative if a parent remains in an abusive marital relationship to try to protect their children, who could be alone with the perpetrator if they divorce.

Kingston Law Group represents fathers and mothers in divorce and custody matters. Who cares for a child, and which kind of care the child receives from whom, should be based on the child’s best interests. We work to ensure our clients aren’t subject to any form of unlawful bias when advocating for their children. Our legal system and statutes are imperfect, but New Jersey law should focus on ensuring a child’s best interests are met, not on providing a particular custody arrangement.

Contact Kingston Law Group for Help with Child Custody Matters

For help with child custody disputes, call us at 609-683-7400 to arrange a near-term, reduced-fee initial consultation. We will listen to your facts, discuss the law, and advise you of your options. We accept credit cards and offer appointments from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. We also have pre-arranged evening appointments. Contact us today.  You will be glad you did!!

The post Is it More Difficult for Jersey Fathers to Get Child Custody? first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

The Kingston Law Group helps employees protect and enforce their rights under state and federal laws. If you have any questions or concerns about an issue with your employer, call us at 609-683-7400 so we can discuss the situation and how we may be able to help.

What Is a Noncompete Agreement?

A noncompete agreement is a contract between your employer and you that restricts your ability to:

• Work (usually for a competitor) or start a competing business
• For a given time period
• Usually also covering a geographic area
• After leaving the company
• Regardless of your reasons for departure

Employers should use these agreements to protect their legitimate interests, such as trade secrets, confidential information, and customer relationships. Your employer might prevent you from working for a rival company or starting your own. The employer could claim it would be unfair if you leveraged the knowledge you gained and the contacts you developed during your time with the company to their disadvantage.

New Jersey courts recognize the anti-competitive nature of non-competes and only will uphold/enforce them if their terms are reasonable.

Recent Federal Developments for Noncompete Agreements

The Trump administration recently dropped its defense of a Biden-era Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rule that would’ve banned most noncompete agreements. In 2024, the FTC published a new non-compete rule that would’ve prohibited new non-compete agreements and made most existing non-competes unenforceable, according to the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy.

The FTC’s majority at the time decided that the federal law empowering the Agency to prevent unfair methods of competition, the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA), covered noncompete agreements. They argued that these contracts illegally restricted competition for job candidates, reducing their wages. The rule faced legal challenges, the agency lost in federal trial courts, and the FTC appealed those decisions.

After Donald Trump won his second election, he appointed a new majority to the Board that controls the agency. They reversed the FTC’s support eviscerating most non-competes, and the Department of Justice withdrew its appeal of lower court rulings in employers’ favor, reports Reuters.

Are Noncompete Agreements Enforceable in New Jersey?

Whether or not there’s a federal law supporting your claim that a noncompete agreement can’t be enforced against you, New Jersey law might decide the issue. New Jersey courts use state law to interpret whether they are valid, and if so, how they would apply in your situation. They use a three-part test to determine enforceability:

• The employer must seek to protect interests like trade secrets, confidential information, or customer relationships
• The agreement cannot impose an unreasonable hardship on your ability to earn a living. A court would consider factors such as why you left the job and whether you can find comparable work in your field with the restrictions in place
• The agreement must not harm the broader public interest

Generally, the enforceability of a New Jersey noncompete agreement depends on whether its terms are interpreted as reasonable. That would be judged on the following basis:

• Courts typically uphold agreements with a duration of six months to two years. The longer the agreement applies, the greater the chance it’ll be seen as excessive and unenforceable
• The restricted geographic area should be limited. The employer may be a local business with limited reach or operate worldwide. How this would be considered would be up to the court
• The agreement must be narrowly tailored. Restricting you from working for direct competitors in your specific role may be reasonable, while preventing you from working anywhere in your industry likely is not

The legality of a noncompete agreement depends on its terms. Unless it contains clearly extreme prohibitions, the agreement’s language, as applied to your situation, would need to be considered.

The key question will be: if federal law opposes limitations on non-competes, do the feds “occupy the field” and preclude State and local reforms of such agreements?  If the feds are deemed to “occupy the field”, then countervailing State or local policies will not prevail.  If they aren’t, then State law will become highly relevant to the outcomes.

What Should I Do If I’m Asked to Sign a Noncompete Agreement or Have Already Done So?

If you’re presented with a noncompete agreement:

• Read it carefully. Understand exactly what activities are restricted, for how long, and in what geographic area
• Consider the impact. How would these restrictions affect your career options if you left the company?
• The employer may be willing to change the proposed terms in their draft agreement. You may be able to limit the duration, geographic scope, or restricted activities through negotiations

Contact us before signing any contract with your employer or potential employer, especially one containing noncompete language. What seems reasonable to you may have serious long-term consequences for your career. It may be much easier and cheaper to negotiate changes in the agreement, or to refuse to sign it, than to agree to it and then challenge the contract.

If you’re currently subject to a noncompete and considering leaving your job, contact our office so we can review it. What you signed may or may not be legally binding. Your employer may also be open to negotiating the terms of your departure, preventing a legal battle. They may have given you a form contract and may not be overly concerned about the language that could hold you back.

Are You Concerned About Your Ability to Find Another Job?

Do you have questions or concerns about how a current or proposed noncompete agreement may prevent you from working elsewhere? If so, we will listen to your facts, explain the law, and suggest right and reasonable approaches for relief.

Kingston Law Group provides compassionate counsel and tough advocacy for employees. We are ready to help you, your loved ones, and your friends. Call us at +1-609-683-7400 or contact us online to schedule a near-term initial consultation at a reduced hourly rate. Call or write us today. You’ll be glad you did.

The post Trump Administration Supports Employers’ Noncompete Agreements and Reverses Biden-Era Restrictions on Employers’ Rights first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

Divorce is one of life’s most emotionally complex experiences, and every couple brings a unique mix of personalities, expectations, and communication styles to the process. While there’s no single explanation why some relationships thrive and others fail, many cultures have traditions that offer insights into personality and compatibility. One of the oldest and most enduring is the Chinese zodiac, a system that links birth years to 12 symbolic animals and five natural elements.

Kingston Law Group’s divorce practice has helped thousands of clients begin anew. No matter what caused your relationship to end, Kingston Law Group will zealously assert and defend your legal rights. We will put in the work required to protect your short- and long-term interests – as well as your children’s. Call us at 609-683-7400 or contact us online to learn more.

The Chinese zodiac can be a fascinating way to try to understand human nature. For some, it provides cultural and emotional context that may influence how couples approach major life events, including marriage and divorce.

What is the Chinese Zodiac System?

The Chinese zodiac is a 12-year cycle, with each year represented by an animal sign: Rat, Ox, Tiger, Rabbit, Dragon, Snake, Horse, Goat, Monkey, Rooster, Dog, and Pig.

Your zodiac sign is determined by your year of birth, following the traditional Chinese lunar calendar. For example, 2020 was the Year of the Rat, 2021 the Year of the Ox, and 2025 will be the Year of the Snake. The zodiac also incorporates five elements: wood, fire, earth, metal, and water. They rotate along with the animal signs.

Each element adds another layer of personality influence. A “wood dragon” may be creative and growth-oriented, while a “metal dragon” might be more ambitious and determined.

These animal and element combinations create a framework for understanding how people think, communicate, and respond to stress. These are all qualities that can deeply affect how people approach relationships and conflicts.

How Might Zodiac Signs Influence Divorce Tendencies?

While the zodiac isn’t seen as destiny, it may reveal personal tendencies that could contribute to marital challenges. Here’s how each sign’s personality traits might play a role in relationship dynamics and divorce:

• Rats are clever, resourceful, and adaptable. They tend to be charming but can also be anxious and secretive. In relationships, they may struggle with trust issues or overthinking their partner’s motives. During divorce, a Rat may be strategic—focused on protecting assets and securing stability
• Patient and dependable, Oxen are grounded and loyal. They value long-term commitment but can be stubborn and slow to compromise. When a marriage ends, Ox-born individuals may find it emotionally difficult to accept change, often prolonging the process because they prefer predictability
• Tigers are bold, passionate, and independent. Their charisma attracts others, but their strong will can lead to power struggles in a relationship. When divorcing, Tigers may want to take charge, sometimes leading to confrontational or high-conflict separations unless guided toward compromise
• Rabbits are gentle, empathetic, and peace-loving. They dislike confrontation and often avoid conflict until tensions become unbearable. In divorce, they may seek mediation or amicable settlements rather than litigation, but they can also be overly accommodating to keep the peace
• Dragons are confident, ambitious, and natural leaders. They have high expectations in relationships and may become frustrated if their partner doesn’t share their drive. During divorce, Dragons tend to be assertive, seeking control over decisions and outcomes. Their pride can make compromise difficult
• Snakes are intuitive, elegant, and private. They value emotional connection but can become jealous or suspicious if they feel betrayed. In divorce, snakes may keep their emotions hidden, focusing instead on negotiation strategy and long-term self-protection
• Energetic and freedom-loving, horses crave excitement and independence. They may struggle in relationships that feel restrictive or routine. A horse divorce can bring a sense of liberation, though they may act impulsively during the process, needing careful legal and emotional guidance
• Goats are artistic, sensitive, and kind-hearted. They are generous partners but they can become emotionally dependent or indecisive. When facing divorce, goats often feel overwhelmed by practical details and may benefit from patient, empathetic legal counsel
• Monkeys are intelligent, curious, and social. They love variety and stimulation, which can make long-term relationships challenging if they become bored. In divorce, monkeys often approach negotiations creatively but may lose focus unless the process is structured
• Practical and detail-oriented, roosters are perfectionists who value honesty and order. They can be critical or rigid in relationships. During divorce, roosters may fixate on fairness and accuracy, which can either streamline the process or stall it if they become overly combative
• Loyal, honest, and compassionate, dogs are protective partners who crave emotional security. When betrayed or disappointed, however, they can become deeply resentful. In divorce, dogs may prioritize fairness and try to shield children or loved ones from conflict
• Pigs are warm, generous, and sincere. They value harmony and dislike deceit, sometimes to the point of naivety. During divorce, they may trust too easily or agree to unfavorable terms to avoid confrontation. Compassionate legal guidance can help them balance kindness with self-protection

Under the Chinese zodiac system, this is only the beginning of the potential influences on a spouse.

How Do the Five Elements Come Into Play?

Each zodiac sign is also influenced by five elements, which rotate every two years and further shape personality and compatibility

• Wood represents growth, creativity, and compassion. Wood signs often seek harmony but may struggle with boundaries in relationships
• Fire brings passion, confidence, and spontaneity. Fire signs can be exciting partners but may have volatile tempers
• Earth reflects stability, responsibility, and loyalty. Earth signs are dependable but may resist change, making divorce emotionally difficult
• Metal embodies strength, determination, and resilience. Metal signs often approach divorce with focus and discipline, but they may be emotionally distant
• Water signifies intuition, empathy, and adaptability. Water signs are emotionally aware and tend to prioritize peaceful resolutions, though they can be overly influenced by others’ emotions

The combination of animal and element creates a personality profile. A fire tiger may be dynamic but confrontational, while a water rabbit might avoid conflict even at personal cost. In divorce proceedings, these tendencies can influence negotiation styles, communication, and emotional recovery.

Of course, no astrological system can determine the outcome of a relationship or legal case. However, acknowledging cultural beliefs respectfully can help attorneys build trust and offer more personalized guidance. Recognizing that a client born in the Year of the Ox might resist rapid change or that a Tiger may prefer a decisive legal strategy could make attorney representation and advocacy more effective.

The Chinese zodiac is more than a horoscope. It’s a centuries-old lens on personality, compatibility, and human behavior. Whether one sees it as cultural wisdom or symbolic storytelling, the Chinese Zodiac can shed light on emotional and behavioral patterns that affect relationships. If you’re navigating through a divorce, understanding personality dynamics, zodiac-inspired or otherwise, will empower you to approach the process with clarity and compassion.

The post How the Chinese Zodiac May Influence Your Relationships, Divorce, and Your Lawyer’s Advocacy first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.

Depending on the circumstances, a controversial media post may give your employer grounds to fire you without violating state or federal laws. But there are many variables in this situation that will dictate the outcome. If you’ve posted something that troubles or could trouble your employer, call our office immediately to discuss your concerns.

Charlie Kirk’s Death Causes Flurry of Online Reaction

Charlie Kirk was a young, controversial conservative who gained fame through his podcasts and online presence. He later co-founded Turning Point USA, a nonprofit organization that promotes conservative values. In September, Kirk was murdered by a young detractor while addressing a group at a Utah university.

Kirk became famous, or infamous, due to his controversial views.  He:

• Questioned the intellectual capabilities of women and black people
• Stated that some gun deaths were justified to have Second Amendment protections for firearm ownership
• Claimed that passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a mistake
• Portrayed immigrants and those who are transgender as existential threats to the country

Kirk’s death, much like his life, was the subject of a massive outpouring of social media posts, from both supporters and critics. The negative response to Kirk varied widely, from people stating they disagreed with what he said, but he shouldn’t have been killed, with others stating they were happy he was dead.

Some employers of some Kirk detractors fired them as a result. They were privately and publicly employed. Some were exposed by conservative groups seeking negative online comments about Kirk, to get people fired as a punishment.

New Jersey Firing Due to Negative Online Kirk Posting

At least one New Jersey resident lost a job due to a personal Facebook post about Kirk after his death, according to the Rider News. Kate Ecke, a Rider University adjunct professor of social work, was fired on September 17. A college-wide email by Rider President John Loyack didn’t name Ecke but stated, in relevant part:

Today, Rider University took swift and decisive action to terminate an adjunct faculty member whose behavior did not reflect our expectations for respectful and civil engagement. During our review of this matter, several individuals at Rider received a threat directed at our campus as a result of this individual’s actions.

In an interview with the newspaper, Ecke stated she was fired for expressing personal views on her own Facebook account. Some of those posts include:

• “I don’t care that Charlie Kirk got shot. Kids are being slaughtered in their classrooms and the same people crying outrage for him have nothing to say when it’s children in body bags. Spare me the hypocrisy. Charlie Kirk chose his platform—those kids never chose to die at school.”
• “[T]he whole message here is that no one deserves to be shot. At school. In a movie theatre. In a library. You’re missing the whole point of this.”
• “For everyone saying ‘Charlie Kirk didn’t deserve to die that way’: Welcome to the f—ing group chat. That’s what we have been saying all along. No one should be shot, ever. That’s … the whole point of this conversation.”

After Ecke’s dismissal, her Union, the American Association of University Professors, stated it would seek her reinstatement. They took the position that she shouldn’t have lost her job for expressing personal beliefs.

Ecke Was Not the Only One Getting Fired

National Public Radio (NPR) reports it found 33 people (many of them teachers, public-sector employees, firefighters, and military members) were fired, placed on leave, or subjected to investigations after social-media posts criticizing Kirk or expressing opinions about his death.

What Legal Protections Do I Have for Expressing Myself and Keeping My Job?

For most private-sector employees, employment is “at will”:  your employer may fire you for any reason that is not illegal, and you are free to quit your job.  A personal social media post could lead to job termination if the employer chooses to take that step, provided it doesn’t violate the law.

It may violate the law if management tolerates certain extreme social media posts by some employees, but not others. If an employer looks the other way when an employee makes racist remarks about Blacks, but fires someone stating something biased against Whites, they may have violated anti-discrimination or anti-equal protection laws.

Discipline and firings may also be illegal if they’re retaliation against someone because of their past protected actions. If someone posts something controversial who has filed for unemployment or workers’ compensation benefits, or has complained about prior discrimination or illegal employer actions, and is fired, but similar posts by those who haven’t engaged in those acts are tolerated, that could be unlawful retaliation.

As discussed below, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and analogous protections under the New Jersey Constitution also may be a basis to attack unlawful or retaliatory workplace discipline.

You may have more legal protections against discipline or firing if you are employed under the terms of a private contract or your workplace is subject to a collectively bargained agreement.

As a Government Employee, Do I Have More Protections Under the US and New Jersey Constitutions?

Yes, but there are limits. If your public employer disciplines you for your speech, a court will consider whether:

• You spoke as a private citizen, not as part of your official duties,
• You spoke about a matter of public concern
• Your interest in speaking outweighs the government’s interest in maintaining workplace efficiency and discipline

If so, your speech will likely be interpreted as protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, and you shouldn’t be disciplined.

New Jersey’s state Constitution offers speech protections: “Every person may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press.”

The N.J. Supreme Court has stated: “New Jersey’s Constitution provides broader protection for free expression than the Federal Constitution and practically all others in the nation.” If you work for a government entity in New Jersey, you may benefit from the increased protection the state constitution offers.

Has Your Employer Treated You Illegally in Some Way?

If you believe your employer violated your rights due to a social media post, we will listen to your facts, explain the law, and suggest right and reasonable approaches for relief.

Kingston Law Group provides compassionate counsel and tough advocacy. We are ready to help you, your loved ones, and your friends. Call us at +1-609-683-7400 or contact us online to schedule a near-term initial consultation at a reduced hourly rate. Call or write us today. You’ll be glad you did.

The post “May I Lawfully Be Fired for a Controversial Social Media Post?” first appeared on Kingston NJ Lawyer Princeton 609-683-7400.